The Business Value of Red Hat Solutions Versus Non-Paid Open Source Alternatives

 

Linux has become the de facto choice of developers and IT departments around the world, but it comes in many varieties, some paid and some non-paid. Why would anyone choose to pay? Read this analyst report for answers. Research firm IDC spoke with organizations using Red Hat products to understand the value of paying for supported solutions instead of non-paid alternatives with self-support. See what they have to say.

Please enter your information below to view this content:




Please choose "Yes" to authorize us to store and process your personal information and provide you the requested content. We use the information you provide to contact you about relevant content, products and services. You may easily unsubscribe from these communications at any time.
Yes No



The Business Value of Red Hat Solutions Versus Non-Paid Open Source Alternatives published by AFL INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING STAFF AND SERVICES INC

What Drives Us
Our motivation is based on search and recruitment of qualified personnel to meet the needs of our customers, providing the opportunity to generate new sources of employment to help the development and growth of the economy of the country.

We also strive to find technological solutions that allow companies to become more efficient and competitive in this era of changes and challenges.

Mission Statement
Providing consulting services in the field of technological resources and human in order to respond in a rapid and objective manner to the needs of our customers and strategic partners, achieving in this way build ties in the long term with them.